The New Answers Book Volume 1
Ken
Ham’s book The New Answers Book: Volume 1 gives scientific answers on
Evolution/Creation and the Bible. Different authors like Jason Lisle, Mike
Riddle, and Ken Ham himself, answer the following questions and more: Why
shouldn’t Christians accept millions of years?
Couldn’t have God used Evolution?
How did defense/attack structures come about? The New Answers Book
explains that genetic information cannot be added, but on the contrary
decreases and that millions of years cannot be proved scientifically.
One
of the main topics is that genetic information can only decrease. The chapter
titled “Does Natural Selection Produce Design?” says that we can witness the
great variety within species-- the variety within the wolf/dog kind: Poodles,
coyotes, wolfs, dingo, collie… and on. “But the point is that no new
information was produced—these varieties of dogs have resulted from a
rearrangement, sorting out, and separation of the information in the original
dog kind.” (13) In everyday life, we do not see kinds turning into other kinds:
We do not see dogs turning into frogs. Information can never increase.
Another
topic talks about how millions of years cannot be proved scientifically. It is summarized
in the topic “Does Radiometric Dating Prove the Earth is Old?” Radiometric
Dating is the principal methods used to “prove” the age of the earth. But this
chapter states that many assumptions are made when dating things with this
method. It uses the illustration of an hourglass, when trying to determine how
much time has the hourglass has been running. One makes three assumptions (pg. 117):
- “Was there any sand at the bottom when the
hourglass was first turned over (initial conditions)?”
- “Has
any sand been added or taken out of the hourglass? (Unlike the open-system nature
of a rock, this is not possible for a sealed hourglass).”
- “Has the sand always been falling at a constant
rate?”
As
with the case of the hourglass, scientists make three critical assumptions when
trying to determine age (pg. 116):
- - “The initial conditions of the rock sample are accurately known.”
- - “The amount of parent or daughter elements in a sample has not been
altered by processes other than radioactive decay.”
- - “The decay rate… of the parent isotope has remained constant since the
rock was formed.”
Then
the chapter mentions that this method has been know to be mistaken when dating rocks. For example,
a rock sample from the 1986 lava dome in Mount St. Helens was dated using this
method. The results stated that the age for the rock was between 0.5 and 2.8
millions of years! Using these and much
more, the book proves that the concept of millions of years is not backed up by
science.
Ken Ham uses science to show that
Macroevolution and millions of years are not remotely possible. The New
Answers Book uses biblical foundations to interpret science and give
answers to Christians. It uses the Bible as authority, and shows that science,
in all aspects, agrees.
Comments
Post a Comment